Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cohen v. Herbal Concepts, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1984Published

1Concurrence

Kassal, J. (concurring).

Plaintiffs appeal from an order which granted the motions by defendants, The Hearst Corporation (Hearst), The Conde Nast Publications, Inc. (Conde Nast), and James Krieger (Krieger), for summary judgment dismissing the first and second causes of action alleging an invasion of plaintiffs’ right to privacy under sections 50 and 51 of the New York Civil Rights Law.

The issue is whether the photograph, concededly published in magazines for advertising purposes, amounts to a *176portrait or picture of the plaintiffs within the contemplation of the statute and whether the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Phillips v. Joseph Kantor & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Binns v. Vitagraph Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Barrett v. JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API