Legal Opinion

Robinson Seed Plant v. Hexter Kramer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1914No. 7150PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Eiror from District Court, Dallas County; Kenneth Foree, Judge. Action by Hexter & Kramer against the Robinson Seed & Plant-Company. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bang error.

1Opinion of the CourtRasburt, J.

Defendants in error sued plaintiffs in error for a sum of money alleged to be the amount due upon a lease of certain premises in the city of Dallas, entered into between plaintiffs in error and Sockwell and Beall, who, before the rents accrued, sold the premises and assigned the lease to defendants in error, and an item of expense for repairs incurred on behalf of plaintiffs in error, and which premises plaintiffs in error vacated before the expiration of the term.

The effect*of plaintiffs in error’s answer was to admit the lease of the premises and the failure to pay the rent for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Massie Rather v. State Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. White v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Early v. IsaacsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Ogus, Rabinovich & Ogus Co. v. Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Thomas v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API