Legal Opinion

Regina Queen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 31, 1990No. 89-7085PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

Appellee, Regina Queen (“Queen”), was awarded a jury verdict of $1.2 million from appellant, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA” or “the Authority”), for injuries she sustained when she was struck by a WMATA vehicle driven by an off-duty WMATA employee. The sole basis for WMATA’s liability was its status as a self-insurer of its vehicles. WMATA now appeals the district court’s determination that under the WMATA Interstate Compact (“WMATA Compact” or “Compact”), Pub.L. No. 89-774, 1966 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad.News (80 Stat.) 1547, Queen…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. James W. McCord Jr. v. F. Lee BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Arnold's Hofbrau, Inc. v. George Hyman Construction Co., Inc., Appellant,and Oliver T. Carr, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Travelers Insur. Co. v. GodseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Belcher v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Gorman v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authorty v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Lizzi v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Howard v. Montgomery Mutual InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Maxwell v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Caldwell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API