Legal Opinion

Diven v. Ashbaugh

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1923Published

Motion for judgment on the complaint under rule 106.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Plaintiff, vendee, sues defendant Ashbaugh, -vendor, to rescind a contract for the sale- of a farm and certain personal property, upon the ground of fraud. Defendant Foody is the owner of certain mortgages on both land and chattels, executed, recorded and filed before the execution of the contract ¿and; .plaintiff’s taking possession thereunder, and of certain judg*214ments against defendant * Ashbaugh, afterwards perfected and docketed. Defendant Prozeller is a subsequent grantee of the legal title to the lands in question. No answer has been served and this is a motion for judgment on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gould v. . Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Ziehen v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Davis v. William Rosenzweig Realty Operating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Proceedings of GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API