Legal Opinion

Bank of Oakman v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 1932No. 6 Div. 984PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Apnolleos concede that the mortgage now held by Alice Thompson was, when executed, inferior to that of complainant executed on the same day, to wit, May 14, 1926. If contained on its face a recital to that effect. The mortgage given to complainant on June 11, 1927, was executed after the record of said inferior one, and, to the extent at least that it secured a new debt presently contract ed for wMcli the first mortgage made no provision (Farmers’ Union Warehouse Co. v. Barnett [Ala. Snp.] 137 So. 176 1 ), it became subordinated to said theretofore inferior mortgage. It was to that extent an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Comer v. SheehanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Lehman Bros. v. Tallassee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Ohmer v. BoyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Scott v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Alabama National Bank v. Mary Lee Coal & Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Sherrod v. Hollywood Holding CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Leeth Nat. Bank v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. City of Mobile v. Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Bay Minette Production Credit Ass'n v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API