Halbert v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Texas
The trial court’s conclusions of fact and law, adopted by the opinion in this case, are as follows: “1. The land in controversy is a part of a tract of 160 acres granted by the State of Texas to Archibald Robinson by letters patent, number 43, volume 15, dated August 19, 1856. said Archibald Robinson and Haney Robinson, his wife, by their deed with full covenants of general warranty, dated April 1, 1887, duly acknowledged April 11,1887, and recorded, conveyed said 160 acres…
Read the full summary
The trial court’s conclusions of fact and law, adopted by the opinion in this case, are as follows: “1. The land in controversy is a part of a tract of 160 acres granted by the State of Texas to Archibald Robinson by letters patent, number 43, volume 15, dated August 19, 1856. said Archibald Robinson and Haney Robinson, his wife, by their deed with full covenants of general warranty, dated April 1, 1887, duly acknowledged April 11,1887, and recorded, conveyed said 160 acres of land to Julian Field. It is stated in this deed that the grantors therein had before that time executed,…
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice.
— The conclusions of law and fact upon which the judgment appealed from was rendered we approve, and hence affirm the judgment.
Affirmed.
Delivered January 2, 1895.
Writ of error refused.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Club Land & Cattle Co. v. WallTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Keels v. KeelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Debes v. Texas Nat. Bank of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936