Legal Opinion

Butler v. Butler

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 3, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Prince, J., Saluda, April, 1905. Action by Henry Butler et ail. against Lucinda Butler et al. Plaintiffs appeal from Circuit decree. cite: 13 S. C., 445; 25 S. C., 505. cites: 24 S. C., 238; 13 S. C., 445; 21 S. C., 162; 24 S. C., 239; 25 S. C., 200, 496; 36 S. C., 25; 60 Am. St. R., 510; 27 L. R. A., 99; 105 U. S., 533.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The brothers and sisters and the nephews and nieces of Silas- Butler brought this action for partition against his widow. Partition in kind having been found impracticable, the land was sold by order of the Court. The master reported that attorneys for plaintiff should be allowed a fee of $2-50 for their services in the partition suit, to be paid out of the proceeds of sale of land before distribution. Upon exception to this recommendation of the master, the Circuit Judge held there was no warrant for the allowance of a fee to the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Erwin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API