Legal Opinion

State v. Varnado

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 11, 1944No. 37680Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

FOURNET, Justice.

L. F. Varnado and Charles Blackwell were charged jointly in a bill of information with the offense of gambling under Article 90 of the Louisiana Criminal Code (Act 43 of 1942) and Varnado’s conviction thereunder was affirmed when this case was originally before us, Blackwell’s appeal being dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We now have the case before us for consideration on Varnado’s application for a re- • hearing.

The principal complaint of the accused was, as pointed out in the majority opinion on the original hearing, the court’s overruling of their motion to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Bartell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Peters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  4. Reynolds v. McArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  5. State v. PeteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API