Legal Opinion
Rossignol v. Rossignol
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 3, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
After 24 years of marriage, defendant Dolores M. Rossignol (hereinafter the wife) commenced an action for divorce against plaintiff (hereinafter the husband). For purposes of equitable distribution, their major asset is dr2 & Company, LLC (hereinafter the LLC), a McDonald’s restaurant operating company formed by the parties during their marriage. During the course of the divorce action, Supreme Court entered an order restraining the husband from accessing any funds in the marital or business banking accounts, fixed the date of commencement of the action as the valuation date of the LLC and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whitney v. WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ripp v. RippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Ripp v. RippNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Boronow v. BoronowNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- O'CONNELL v. CorcoranNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sanders v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v. New York State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Sanders v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013