Legal Opinion

Ziegler v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 2, 1978No. Docket No. 10614-75Published

P, who then practiced law alone, established a qualified retirement plan to which he made contributions on his own behalf. Subsequently, he joined a partnership for the practice of law and received a premature distribution of his interest in such plan.

Read the full summary

P, who then practiced law alone, established a qualified retirement plan to which he made contributions on his own behalf. Subsequently, he joined a partnership for the practice of law and received a premature distribution of his interest in such plan. A new qualified retirement plan was established by the partnership, and contributions were made on behalf of P. Held, under sec. 401(d)(5)(C), I.R.C. 1954, P was prohibited from participating as an owner-employee in a qualified retirement plan for 5 years succeeding the year of the premature distribution, and as a result, he was not entitled to…

1Opinion of the Court

Donald E. Ziegler and Claudia J. Ziegler, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Ziegler v. Commissioner

Docket No. 10614-75

United States Tax Court

70 T.C. 139; 1978 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 130;

May 2, 1978, Filed

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

P, who then practiced law alone, established a qualified retirement plan to which he made contributions on his own behalf. Subsequently, he joined a partnership for the practice of law and received a premature distribution of his interest in such plan. A new qualified retirement plan was established by the partnership, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Southern California Loan Asso. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  3. Doing v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  4. Ziegler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API