Denson v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
Headnotes 1-3, 6 and 7 require no elaboration.
There was no eyewitness to the killing. The conviction of the defendant depends entirely upon his confessions and the facts and circumstances corroborating them. The evidence shows a brutal and wanton slaying. The confessions which were admitted in evidence contain a full and complete admission of guilt on the part of the defendant, and the facts and circumstances fully corroborate these confessions. Whether the verdict of the jury finding the defendant guilty of the crime be upheld, depends solely upon the question of whether or…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Kelley v. Austell Building Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Boggus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Rooker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.