Legal Opinion

(PC) Gradford v. Velasco

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 30, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00543Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, No. 1:20-cv-00543-NONE-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION DISMISS 14 F. VELASCO and T. WEBSTER, (ECF No. 42) 15 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING GRANTING 16 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS 17 (ECF Nos. 49) 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 19 RECOMMENDING DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER 20 (ECF No. 45) 21 TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 22 WARNING CONCERNING FRIVOLOUS 23 FILINGS 24…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corporation, United States Ex Rel. Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API