Legal Opinion

Braunstein v. Statewide Grievance, No. Cv 99 0497398s (Feb. 9, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 9, 2001No. CV 99 0497398SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The plaintiff in the above-captioned matter is a member of the Connecticut bar. He appeals pursuant to Practice Book § 2-38 from a decision of the Statewide Grievance Committee. The Grievance Committee concluded that the plaintiff violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: Singer, complaint No. 95-0557-Rules 1.7(a), and 1.13(e);Grossman, complaint No. 95-0393-Rules 1.7(b), 1.8 and 1.13(e) (Return of Record, ("ROR"), Items #98, p. 998; #99, p. 1004; #101, p. 1050; #102, p. 1051). The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Pinsky v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Dolgner v. AlanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Hospital of St. Raphael v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API