Legal Opinion

City of Garland v. Futerfas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1983No. 05-83-01010-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

On our own motion we have inquired of counsel whether the order appealed from is appealable. After considering the responses of all parties, we conclude that it is not subject to review because it is an interlocutory permanent injunction. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

This is a nuisance action brought by the City of Garland against the owners and the former lessee of certain property. In addition to their injunctive relief, costs and general relief, plaintiff City of Garland sought from the defendants damages and penalties under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Aloe Vera of America, Inc. v. CIC Cosmetics International Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Windmill Dinner Theatre of Dallas, Inc. v. HaglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kelso v. ThorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. City of Houston v. Willow Run Public Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Khraish v. Hamed, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. Khraish v. Hamed, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. Mary Smith D/B/A Upscale Child Development Center v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API