Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kolbach v. Kolbach

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2016No. 27366Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

.WILBUR, Justice

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

[¶ 27.] I write to dissent on the issue of alimony. It is hot for this Court to sit as a fact finder and substitute its judgment for that , of the circuit court. Our standard of review does not examine whether we would have made the same decision. In fact, SDCL 25-4-41 gives the circuit court discretion to grant “suitable allowance to” a spouse “as the court may deem just, having regard to the circumstances of the parties Tepresented[.]” Yet, here, the majority opinión disregards the court’s discretion. It also disregards “[o]iir…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wallahan v. WallahanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Grode v. GrodeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mellema v. MellemaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Nickles v. NicklesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hagedorn v. HagedornSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API