Kolbach v. Kolbach
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
.WILBUR, Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
[¶ 27.] I write to dissent on the issue of alimony. It is hot for this Court to sit as a fact finder and substitute its judgment for that , of the circuit court. Our standard of review does not examine whether we would have made the same decision. In fact, SDCL 25-4-41 gives the circuit court discretion to grant “suitable allowance to” a spouse “as the court may deem just, having regard to the circumstances of the parties Tepresented[.]” Yet, here, the majority opinión disregards the court’s discretion. It also disregards “[o]iir…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wallahan v. WallahanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Grode v. GrodeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Mellema v. MellemaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Nickles v. NicklesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Hagedorn v. HagedornSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.