De Mattos v. Camp & Hinton Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Oivil District Oom-t, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge. Action by Max Teixeira de Mattos against the Camp & Hinton Company, defendant, and the Illinois Central Railroad and others, garnishees. From a judgment for defendants and garnishees, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.
Plaintiff, domiciled in Louisiana, sued the defendant, a foreign corporation, for a large amount. He at the same time obtained an attachment.
The court appointed a curator ad hoc to represent the corporation, an absentee, in the attachment proceedings.
*253The railway companies, according to plaintiff, debtors to defendants, were made parties garnishees, and certain alleged debts of the railway companies, garnishees, to defendant, plaintiff urged, were seised and garnished.
The plaintiff propounded interrogatories to the garnishees.
They were answered a few days after plaintiff had filed his suit.
Thes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Security Trust Co. v. Dodd, Mead & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Lewis v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co v. Keokuk Northern Line Packet Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Humphreys v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Pond v. CookeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935