Legal Opinion

Bell v. Toyota

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 20, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 16, 1978, denying defendants’ motion to preclude plaintiffs from offering evidence as to those items in defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars for which allegedly inadequate answers were given, or, in the alternative, for a further bill, is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the *586exercise of discretion, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellants, and defendants’ motion is granted to the extent of directing plaintiffs to serve a further bill of particulars with respect to items Nos. 13, 15, 16,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. New York University Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Cornachio v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. King v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gaye v. GriffithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. MatamoroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. MatamoroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Zweig v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Kelly v. American International Health Facilities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API