Legal Opinion

Henderson v. A. Meyers & Bro.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1893No. 11,146PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. King, J. cited: O. C., Art. 2705-2707; Baudry-Lacantiniere, Vol. 3, p, 639; 5 An. 712; 2 N. S. 229; 13 La. 193; 11 Rob. 107; 20 An. 539. cited: Laurent, Yol. 25, Sec. 232; C. C., Art. 2167; 15 An. 175; 15 Wall. 600; 32 An. 348; 41 An. 227.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

Plaintiffs, domiciled in Kentucky, leased for the period of five years, beginning October 1, 1890, to the defendants, A. & J. Meyers, clothiers, the premises in which they conducted their business, at;an annual rental of $5250, payable in monthly instalments, for which they furnished sixty promissory notes of $437.50 each, and obligated themselves to pay 5 per cent, attorney’s fee in case of suit.

The lease contains the stipulation that the lessees should not sublet the property without the consent of the lessor.

It was also stipulated that in…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Audubon Hotel Co. v. BraunnigSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Burdon Central Sugar Refining Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Gamble v. New Orleans Housing Mart, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  5. New Orleans & N. W. R. v. Town of VidaliaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API