Legal Opinion
Middleton v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 27, 1999No. CIV. A. HNM-98-1300PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MALETZ, Senior Judge. 1
On April 27, 1998, Darrell Middleton filed a complaint alleging that his employer, Frito-Lay, Inc. (herein Frito-Lay), discriminated against him in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (herein Title VII). Defendant seeks summary judgment on all counts of the complaint. After careful review of the record, the motion for summary judgment is granted.
I
Plaintiff was hired as a Sanitation Operator at Frito-Lay in Aberdeen, Maryland on March' 13, 1996. In his first few months on the job, his work was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spriggs v. Public Service Com'n of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Byrd v. the Baltimore Sun Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Nichols v. Caroline County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000