Legal Opinion

De Jonge v. Blum

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

opinion of the court

Memorandum.

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The allowance for an unborn child may not be prórated by counting the expectant mother as a member of the statutory household when in fact she has no unmet needs (Snowberger v Toia, 46 NY2d 803). Nor may the commissioner urge that it is reasonable to treat an unborn child differently from other needy persons in view of the fact that the commissioner’s own regulations expressly provide that an unborn child shall be considered as a living child for the purpose of the basic allowance (18 NYCRR…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pollak v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Snowberger v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Melendez v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API