Legal Opinion

Rifkin v. Manhattan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover upon a life insurance policy, order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and granting defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, without costs. It is not disputed that the insured well knew at the time he received the amount of the loan that the annual premium due November 28, 1930, had been deducted. He was not, therefore, misled, (del Rio v. Prudential Ins. Co., 269 N. Y. 135.) He further well knew, and was advised *733by defendant, that unless the annual premium due November 28,1931, was paid,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Starker v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API