Legal Opinion
Aussieker v. City of Bloomington
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 27, 2005No. 4-04-0540PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann
In this case, we consider whether each plaintiff in a multiple-plaintiff civil case is entitled to one motion for substitution of judge as of right under section 2 — 1001(a)(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Civil Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 1001(a)(2) (West 2002)). We conclude that the answer is yes, and we reverse the trial court’s order denying plaintiff Arnold R. Zimmer’s motion for substitution of judge as of right.
I. BACKGROUND
On April 26, 2004, plaintiffs, 17 taxpayers and real estate owners, filed a declaratory judgment action against defendant, the City of Bloomington, alleging that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Raintree Homes, Inc. v. Village of Long GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Estate of PooleIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Scroggins v. ScrogginsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Sahoury v. MosesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Beahringer v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Powell v. Dean Foods CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Estate of GagliardoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Powell v. Dean Foods CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- In Re Estate of GagliardoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Powell v. Dean Foods Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.