State v. Loveland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant is presently serving two concurrent maximum indeterminate terms of 5 years’ imprisonment, one for a 1971 burglary conviction, the other for a 1973 conviction for distribution of a controlled substance. Defendant was originally given 2 years’ probation and a stay of imposition of sentence on the burglary conviction, but the stay was vacated and sentence imposed when defendant violated the terms of his probation by committing the drug offense.
The issue on this appeal from the court’s order revoking probation and imposing sentence 1 relates to the fact that parolees are given good time…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ahern v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Sargent v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Sorel SheadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Vezina v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Vezina v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979