Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Wooten

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1987No. 51934Published

1ConcurrenceSatz, Judge

Under present Missouri law, I am constrained to concur.

We, as appellate courts, repeatedly state that a trial court’s refusal to permit an alibi witness to testify is a drastic action, as drastic an action as granting a mistrial, and, therefore, when a request for either action is made, the trial court should exercise extreme caution in granting either request. See, e.g., State v. Mansfield, 637 S.W.2d 699, 703 (Mo. banc 1982); State v. Gooch, 659 S.W.2d 342, 343-344 (Mo.App.1983). It is curious, however, that, more often than not, we affirm the grant of the state’s request to prevent an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. State v. DiamondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API