Legal Opinion

Poughkeepsie Iron & Metal Co. v. Ermco Erectors, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Vincent Grady, J.

The contractor petitioner, by order to show Pause, seeks an order pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 76 of the Lien Law vacating the demand of Ermco Erectors, Inc., respondent lienor. The contractor contends that by perfecting a mechanics’ lien, the lienor has elected to pursue this remedy and is therefore precluded under article 3-A of the Lien Law in serving a demand for a verified statement.

The movant cites Hall v. Blumberg (26 A D 2d 64), in support of its contention and further claims that the lienor’s interests are fully protected by .the bond filed herein by the contractor. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. John R. Philip, Inc. v. LangellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers Local No. 26 v. Hebert Industrial Insulation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. New Rochelle Contracting Corp. v. American Steel Erectors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API