Daniel Chestang v. D. Sisto
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
In 1993, Petitioner-Appellant Daniel K. Chestang pleaded guilty to the first-degree murder of Marlena Brooks and Sydney Newman in Sacramento, California. In 1994, he was sentenced to 60 years to life. Chestang argues that a 1993 psychological report and a 2004 declaration from his co-defendant confessing to the murders establish his actual innocence, thereby making his 2007 federal habeas petition timely under McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L.Ed.2d 1019 (2013) and Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc). We have jurisdiction over this appeal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Lee v. LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Anthony (Tony) Gaston v. Anna Ramirez PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3Cited by11 opinions
- (HC) Rivas v. KoenigDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Cedric Taylor v. Sean MooreDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Edware Dewayne Dorsey v. Christian PheifferDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Hinds v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Hoskinson v. Department Of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.