Legal Opinion

Gray v. . Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1895PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Civil aotioN, for the recovery of land, tried before Brown, J., at Fall Term, 1895, of Davie Superior Court, on a case agreed, the material facts of which appear in the opinion of Chief Justice Faiecloth. ITis Honor held that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover and rendered judgment accordingly, and plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Faircloth, C. J.:

In 1888 the land in controversy was conveyed by deed in fee to F. M. Johnson and his wife A. L. Johnson. On December 3, 1891, F. M. Johnson conveyed his interest in the land to Bailey & Gfaither in trust for the purposes recited. In May, 1892, the trustees sold the land and the wife became the purchaser, who died on the 29th of October, 1892, leaving a will in which she devised the land to the defendant. On December 8, 1.391, a judgment was obtained against F. M. Johnson and docketed, and on July 2, 1894, the sheriff sold the land to satisfy the judgment, the husband still…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bruce v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Ketchum v. WalsworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. McNeeley v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Freeman v. BelferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Moore v. Greenville Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Ray v. Long.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API