Legal Opinion
Pearl-Phil GMT (Far East) Ltd. v. Caldor Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2001No. 99 Civ. 11798(RCC)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASEY, District Judge.
Pearl-Phil GMT (Far East) Ltd. (“Pearl” or “Appellant”) appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), from the Memorandum Decision and Order entered November 1, 1999, by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York ruling in favor of debtor The Caldor Corporation and its affiliates (collectively, “Caldor” or “Appellee”). Pearl argues that the Bankruptcy Court, Garrity, J., erred in holding that Pearl’s claim for damages from Caldor’s breach of certain purchase orders “arose” at the time the contracts were entered into, thus meriting only…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re All Media Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re GriffinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- In re Motors Liquidation Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Tia Robinson v. eCast Settlement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Keeler v. PRA Receivables Management, LLC (In Re Keeler)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In re Hawker Beechcraft, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.