Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Marable
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 1923No. 11,493PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, C. J.
Complaint by appellee seeking a recovery for compensation for services claimed to have been rendered by him as brakeman during a period of time when he was regularly employed by appellant at a fixed compensation as porter on one of its passenger trains running between Louisville, Kentucky, and Logansport, Indiana.
A judgment on a former trial of this cause was reversed by the Supreme Court (Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Marable [1919], 189 Ind. 278, 126 N. E. 849) and a new trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee for $1,000. In connection with the general verdict, the jury answered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Indiana Railway Co. v. MaurerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Ohio Valley Trust Co. v. WernkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Abbitt v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Terre Haute Electric Co. v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Grisell v. Noel Bros. Flour, Feed Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trojnar v. BihlmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1964
- Starbuck v. Fletcher Savings & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1930