Legal Opinion
Coutts v. Grant
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 1960No. Civ. 6426PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
The plaintiffs invested $11,700 in the purchase of shares of stock of Bonanza Oil Corporation as a result of a transaction in which the defendants participated. The sale took place in California. Bonanza Oil Corporation was a Nevada corporation which had not obtained a permit to sell its stock in the State of California. By their complaint the plaintiffs, in one count, allege that the defendants bought this stock for them as their agents, paying 10 cents a share therefor and charging them $1.00 per share; and in a second count, allege that the defendants sold this stock to them in violation…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Banning v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Pope v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Technomedical Labs, Inc. v. Utah Securities DivisionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Napolitano v. MartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Welker v. Scripps Clinic & Research FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.