Legal Opinion

City of Atlanta v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1908No. 684Published

Action for damages, from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. June 22, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

1. No constitutional question, such as to require certification to the Supreme Court, is presented in the record. Hayes v. Atlanta, 1 Ga. App. 28 (57 S. E. 1087); Anderson v. State, 2 Ga. App. 1 (58 S. E. 401), and cases cited.

2. Many of the points made in the present record were decided adversely to- the plaintiff in error, when this case was previously before this, court. See Hayes v. Atlanta, supra.

3. The assignments of error as to the admission or exclusion of testimony are, under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, insufficient to raise any question for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Spence v. MorrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Yates v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Barker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API