Legal Opinion

Emigh v. Tinter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 1959No. 58-415PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment appealed from is affirmed except the part thereof awarding costs to appellees.

It appears from the record that appellees took testimony by deposition of several witnesses, which depositions were neither introduced in evidence nor used in any manner during the course of the trial. The expenses incurred in procuring these depositions were taxed as cost against the unsuccessful appellants.

Whether the expenses of procuring depositions may be allowed as taxable costs in a civil action rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.1 This court is committed to the proposition that a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loftin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Wilson v. RooneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Crane v. StulzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. GORDON INTERNAT'L ADV., INC. v. Charlotte County L. & T. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Butler v. BorowskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Buyer Finance Corp. v. OliverosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API