Legal Opinion

Yeager's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1906No. Appeal, No. 77PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 77, April T., 1906, by Margaret Miller, from decree of O. C. Mercer Co., Oct. T., 1908, No. 10, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in Estate of Sarah E. Yeager, deceased. Exceptions to report of James D. Emery, Esq., auditor. Before Williams, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Errors assigned were to various findings of law.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

This is an appeal, by Margaret Miller, a daughter of the decedent, and exceptant below, from the final decree of the *203orphans’ court of Mercer county upon the account of Dr. M. G. Yeager, administrator of the estate of Sarah E. Yeager, deceased.

The able and fair presentation of the disputed questions by the learned counsel for the appellant and appellee enables us to get a fair grasp of the facts upon which the controversy arises, without difficulty. The counsel for the appellee has concisely stated the errors of which the learned counsel for the appellant complains as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watkins v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Boyd v. Conshohocken Worsted MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Estate of CorsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Lowrey v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Gettysburg National Bank v. KuhnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City Trust & Savings Bank v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API