Legal Opinion

Commissioners of Parks & Boulevards v. Common Council

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus. Bolators applied for mandamus to compel the common council of the city of Detroit to rescind their action in the appointment of their co-respondents as superintendents, etc., of Belle Isle bridge, and to turn over its control to relators. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is a petition for mandamus to compel the common council of the city of Detroit to rescind and set aside their action appointing certain persons, who are also made parties hereto, as superintendent, assistant superintendents, engineers, assistant engineers, gate-tenders, and sweepers of Belle Isle bridge and its approaches, ••and to turn over the possession and control of said bridge to the relators, and also commanding such super-, intondént, assistant superintendents, engineers, assistant engineers, gate-tenders, and sweepers to surrender their positions so held by them under the action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Board of Park Commissioners v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Blades v. Board of Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Turner v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Maybury v. BolgerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Abrey v. LivingstoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API