Legal Opinion

Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 12, 2022No. 1:19-cv-20896Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Keith Stansell, and others, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 19-20896-Civ-Scola v. ) ) Revolutionary Armed Forces of ) Columbia and others, Defendants. ) Order Denying Motion for Protective Order This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants’ motion for a protective order (ECF No. 516). The Plaintiffs have responded. (ECF No. 517.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion for a protective order. (ECF No. 516). 1. The Plaintiffs Are Entitled to Pre-Trial Discovery Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) allows…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motsinger v. FlyntDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
  2. United States v. Khalid A. ShalhoubCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  3. Johanna Maria Vibe Ener v. Pedro Antonio MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  4. RPS, Inc. v. Travel Max International, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API