Legal Opinion

Drake v. Lipow

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.

The receiver pendente lite heretofore appointed herein moves that defendant Gardner be *186adjudged in contempt of court, it being claimed that said defendant has in his possession ‘1 certain securities and other evidences of indebtedness ’ ’ which he refuses to turn over to the receiver unless it be stipulated not to negotiate or convert same into cash.

It is well settled that contempt proceedings are to be construed stricti juris (Goldie v. Goldie, 77 App. Div. 12, 14; Flor v. Flor, 73 App. Div. 262; People ex rel. Clarke v. Truesdell, 79 N. Y. S 2d 413).

A party cannot be adjudged in contempt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldie v. GoldieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Flor v. FlorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Fromme v. JareckyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  4. In re BlumenthalAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bank Leumi Trust Co. v. Taylor-CishahayoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API