Legal Opinion

Layland v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1976No. 2739PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the superior court was “clearly mistaken” 1 in imposing a sentence of eight years with one-third to be served without the possibility of parole. The trial court entered this sentence after appellant Fred Layland was found guilty by a jury of manslaughter.

On November 17, 1973, Layland, while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage, drove his automobile across the center line on the Glen Highway near Anchorage, Alaska. Layland’s automobile collided with another vehicle carrying three young men— one of the occupants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hixon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Perrin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gullard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hunter v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pears v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Nukapigak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Buchanan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Pears v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API