Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Schara v. Holmes

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1956No. 9623Published

1Dissent

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

(dissenting).

I do not agree with the majority opinion. I do not see any analogy between this case and those dealing with a public office. All of the cases relied on as condemning an appointment before the law creating the office became effective, or was approved by the governor, are cases having to do with public offices.

Here the members have no power or authority to enact legislation. Their only function is to investigate, assemble and collect information and report to the legislature. They have not been vested with any portion of the sovereign power of government. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. Shirley v. LutzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Dunbar v. CroninArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Broadwater v. KendigMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Pashman v. FriedbauerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API