Legal Opinion

Cigelski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 16, 1985No. BE-60PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

470 So.2d 46 (1985)

Richard A. CIGELSKI, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BE-60.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 1985.

David A. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

THOMPSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant contends that his sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law. We agree and reverse.

This is the second appeal relating to appellant's sentence. The sentence was initially appealed to this…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. Beech v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Cigelski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Broxton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cheney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Kline v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Gwynn v. Orange County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Gwynn v. ORANGE CTY. BD. OF CTY. COMM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API