Legal Opinion

Lehtinen, Vargas & Riedi, P.A. v. Straub

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 26, 2009No. SC08-110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review Straub v. Lehtinen, Vargas Riedi, P.A., 980 So.2d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal recognized the viability of a false light invasion of privacy cause of action but certified the following question as one of great public importance: “Does Florida recognize the tort of false light invasion of privacy, and if so, are the elements of the tort set forth in section 652E of Restatement (Second) of Torts?” Straub, 980 So.2d at 1087. The Fourth District had previously certified the same question in Rapp v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 944 So.2d 460…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. RappSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Rapp v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Straub v. LEHTINEN, VARGAS & RIEDI, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. W.J.A. v. D.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. Straub v. Lehtinen, Vargas & Riedi, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Wja v. DaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API