Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Day

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2008No. M2006-00989-SC-R11-CDPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J.,

dissenting in part.

The State of Tennessee filed its Tenn. R.App. P. 11 application in this case to determine whether Tennessee recognizes the “community caretaking” exception to the requirement that police officers have at least reasonable suspicion when they make a traffic stop. I agree with the Court’s conclusion that we cannot address this question because it is beyond the scope of the legal issue certified to this Court in accordance with Tenn. R.Crim. P. 37(b)(2). Rather than dismissing the appeal as being improvidently granted, the Court has decided to determine…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API