Legal Opinion

Lord v. Borough of Pottstown

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1997No. 96-CV-7181; Bankruptcy No. 95-BK-7181PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CAHN, Chief Judge.

Appellants Thomas and Barbara Lord (“Lords”) appeal the decision of the Bankruptcy Court that the ninety day limitation of liability for water service charges set forth in Pennsylvania’s Municipality Authorities Act, 53 P.S. § 306B(h.l), does not apply to a landlord’s liability for delinquent water charges, when the municipality had no knowledge of the identities of the tenants and had no agreements with the tenants to provide service.

I. Background

Thomas and Barbara Lord own 45 to 50 low-income residential properties in the Borough of Pottstown (“Borough”). These…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Morris Rosen, Debtor v. Karen E. Bezner, Trustee, Morris RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. In Re Sharon Steel Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Dwg Corporation and Victor PosnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Philadelphia v. Northwood Textile Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Skupien v. Borough of GallitzinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Borough of Ellwood City, Lawrence County, PA v. Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Thomas E. Lord, Barbara J. Lord v. Borough of PottstownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API