Hamilton v. Houston
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. The ultimate goal in child-custody cases is the best interest of the child. While Mississippi law presumes a child’s best interests are served by living with his natural parents, when a natural parent abandons or deserts the child, the natural-parent presumption goes away. At that point, the chancellor must determine whether it is in the child’s best interest to award custody to the parent or a third party.
¶ 2. Here, the chancellor found that both Jerrica Hamilton and Edward Houston had deserted their son, Jaquavion. With the natural-parent presumption gone, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Albright v. AlbrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Rutland v. PridgenMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Lee v. LeeMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Marriage of Leverock & HambyMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Mabus v. MabusMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Irle v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
- J.S.W. v. A.W.R.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013