Legal Opinion
Newland v. Edgar
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1966No. 20480PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court for the plaintiffs, Win-cel T. and Helen E. Edgar, husband and wife, declaring their note and mortgage on real property in Idaho extinguished and satisfied and awarding them a usury penalty as provided under the laws of that State. We conclude, however, that the district court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter.
Plaintiffs were and are residents and citizens of Idaho. They commenced this suit against Hughes Homes, Inc., a Montana corporation, in the Idaho state court. By their complaint they sought a penalty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Johnson v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- A. Musto Co., Inc. v. SatranDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- Gillman v. Preston Family Investment Co. (In Re Richardson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1983
- Waxman v. KealohaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1969
- Newland v. EdgarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.