Legal Opinion

American Airlines v. Christensen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1992No. 91-4047PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises three issues. First, did the district court err by holding that the Plaintiff's “no-sale” rule was enforceable as a matter of law without undertaking an analysis of its “reasonableness”? Second, did the Plaintiff demonstrate an injury sufficient to warrant a partial summary judgment as to liability and the issuance of a permanent injunction? And third, was there sufficient proof to hold each of the individual Defendants liable? We answer the first question in the negative and the second and third questions in *412the affirmative. Accordingly, we affirm the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Charles William KunzmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Continental Airlines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Debtor-In-Possession v. Intra Brokers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API