Ph&x152nix Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Connelly
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This is a controversy between the beneficiary of a life insurance policy and a person to whom the insured had assigned the policy as collateral for a loan. The insured died, leaving the loan unpaid. The assignee claims an amount sufficient for repayment. The contending beneficiary is the widow of the insured who after the assignment became a substituted beneficiary, through exercise of the power to change the beneficiary reserved in the policy to the insured. She claims the entire amount of the proceeds on the theory that she acquired a “vested interest” which had not…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barbin v. MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- Sullivan v. MaroneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
- Massachusetts Linotyping Corp. v. FieldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SwansonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Burlington County Trust Co. v. Di CastelcicalaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Continental Assur. Co. v. ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Molly G. BessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. HeynDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Continental Assur. Co. v. ConroyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- Prudential Ins. v. DouglasDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953