Legal Opinion

Badalamenti v. Office of District Attorney Nassau County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, he was not entitled to the disclosure of a cellular phone entered into evidence at his criminal trial under the Freedom of Information Law (hereinafter FOIL), as “physical evidence does not fall within the statutory definition of a ‘record’ ” (Matter of Allen v Strojnowski, 129 AD2d 700, 700-701 [1987]; see Matter of Sideri v Office of Dist. Attorney of N.Y. County, 243 AD2d 423 [1997]; Matter of Dobranski v Houper, 154 AD2d 736, 739 [1989]).

*1020Further, with respect to the request for disclosure of a recording and accompanying transcript from an alleged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Khatibi v. WeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Moore v. SantucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Dobranski v. HouperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Allen v. J. J. StrojnowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Adams v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Pendell v. Columbia County Dist. Attorney's Off.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API