Badalamenti v. Office of District Attorney Nassau County
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, he was not entitled to the disclosure of a cellular phone entered into evidence at his criminal trial under the Freedom of Information Law (hereinafter FOIL), as “physical evidence does not fall within the statutory definition of a ‘record’ ” (Matter of Allen v Strojnowski, 129 AD2d 700, 700-701 [1987]; see Matter of Sideri v Office of Dist. Attorney of N.Y. County, 243 AD2d 423 [1997]; Matter of Dobranski v Houper, 154 AD2d 736, 739 [1989]).
*1020Further, with respect to the request for disclosure of a recording and accompanying transcript from an alleged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Khatibi v. WeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Moore v. SantucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Dobranski v. HouperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Allen v. J. J. StrojnowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Adams v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Pendell v. Columbia County Dist. Attorney's Off.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018