Legal Opinion

Portland General Electric Co. v. Mead

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 16, 2010No. 062137; A139931Published

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

The issue in this case is one of law — whether a statutory change to costs, including attorney fee awards, in eminent domain cases applied to cases that were pending when the statute went into effect. The trial court concluded that the statute applied to all prospective cost awards without regard to when the case was filed, and awarded costs. Condemnor appeals. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that the statute requires an award of attorney fees in this case and, therefore, affirm.

Under Oregon law, a condemning authority must make a written offer to purchase property for its fair…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API