Legal Opinion

Kainen v. Harris

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 3, 2000No. SC00-1644PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

769 So.2d 1029 (2000)

Dennis G. KAINEN, et al., Petitioners,

v.

Katherine HARRIS, as Secretary of State, Respondent.

No. SC00-1644.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 3, 2000.

Bruce Rogow and Beverly A. Pohl of Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Petitioners.

Deborah K. Kearney, General Counsel and Kerey Carpenter, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, Florida; and Tom Warner, Solicitor General, Richard A. Hixson, and T. Kent Wetherell, II, Deputy Solicitors General, on behalf of Attorney General Robert A. Butterworth, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.

Joseph W. Little,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · Anstead; Concurrence · Pariente; Concurrence · Wells.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Askew v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Armstrong v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Gray v. BryantSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Advisory Opin. Governor Re Appt. or Elect. of JudgesSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Advisory Opinion to GovernorSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Feldman v. City of North MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API