Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Mongini

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1928No. 6104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge :

Blankenship sold a lot to Mongini with covenants of special warranty and “the right to convey”. Part of the consideration for the lot was paid in cash and a vendor’s lien reserved for the balance. The vendee failed to pay the balance and this suit was brought to subject the lot to sale under the vendor’s lien. In Mongini’s answer to the original bill he admitted the purchase of the lot but alleged that Blankenship had no title to and no right to convey it, and that the title thereto was in the heirs of Ida S. Bolen, deceased, and prayed that his deed be cancelled and his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. TennantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Chapman v. BranchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Eakin v. EakinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Benet v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  5. Hale v. HaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beckley Nat. Bank v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. Adkins v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Merchants National Bank of Point Pleasant v. RalphsnyderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Adkins v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Aldrich v. AldrichWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API